<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Having Trouble Attracting the Right Candidates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/</link>
	<description>Leveraging LinkedIn, Twitter, Social Media, Resume Databases, and the Internet for Sourcing and Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:31:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmail</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-7824</link>
		<dc:creator>gmail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-7824</guid>
		<description>[...] if you have the most fantastic and compelling job postings, as I recently wrote, passive and non-job seekers typically don’t even “see” job postings or employer branding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if you have the most fantastic and compelling job postings, as I recently wrote, passive and non-job seekers typically don’t even “see” job postings or employer branding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Bartfield</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6302</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Bartfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 14:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6302</guid>
		<description>Great post.  By and large &#039;finding&#039; will yield a higher quality candidate than being &#039;found&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  By and large &#8216;finding&#8217; will yield a higher quality candidate than being &#8216;found&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Brablc</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6296</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Brablc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6296</guid>
		<description>Great Post!  I totally agree with you on most of your points.

The first step for most companies is to create the content and increase the # of candidates that they are getting through their recruitment marketing funnel.  

Once they are overflowing, they need to determine what skills they are exactly looking for in new candidates and put some tests / measures in their apply process to screen for these skills.

This gives you a great base of qualified candidates to begin sourcing and contacting through social media and other forms.  Also, I think most importantly companies need to put processes in place to identify and add the best candidates to their Talent Networks because a certain qualified candidate may not be a great fit for the job you are looking to fill right now, but future jobs may be great fits.

Form relationships, and make sure to keep them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!  I totally agree with you on most of your points.</p>
<p>The first step for most companies is to create the content and increase the # of candidates that they are getting through their recruitment marketing funnel.  </p>
<p>Once they are overflowing, they need to determine what skills they are exactly looking for in new candidates and put some tests / measures in their apply process to screen for these skills.</p>
<p>This gives you a great base of qualified candidates to begin sourcing and contacting through social media and other forms.  Also, I think most importantly companies need to put processes in place to identify and add the best candidates to their Talent Networks because a certain qualified candidate may not be a great fit for the job you are looking to fill right now, but future jobs may be great fits.</p>
<p>Form relationships, and make sure to keep them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6293</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6293</guid>
		<description>@Coresourcing - I agree with you to some extent. However, I would equate searching large resume databases (job board or your own) as the true deep sea diving - most people only scratch the surface of what&#039;s actually available. I would also say that although that each of the sources/skills you detailed can and do produce results, I would argue there is a difference in the ability to quickly identify people with very specific skills and experience. I just worry that people are unknowingly spending 80% of their time on what will only produce 20% of the results, at the expense of doing it the other way around.

@Sarang - definitely. I fear there are more people who wait for things to happen/people to come to them - without taking control of the effort and going out to hunt, you&#039;re simply a talent farmer at best, and a talent trapper at worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Coresourcing &#8211; I agree with you to some extent. However, I would equate searching large resume databases (job board or your own) as the true deep sea diving &#8211; most people only scratch the surface of what&#8217;s actually available. I would also say that although that each of the sources/skills you detailed can and do produce results, I would argue there is a difference in the ability to quickly identify people with very specific skills and experience. I just worry that people are unknowingly spending 80% of their time on what will only produce 20% of the results, at the expense of doing it the other way around.</p>
<p>@Sarang &#8211; definitely. I fear there are more people who wait for things to happen/people to come to them &#8211; without taking control of the effort and going out to hunt, you&#8217;re simply a talent farmer at best, and a talent trapper at worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6292</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6292</guid>
		<description>@Kristin - thank you for your comment! The simple fact that the majority of people are NOT looking is reason enough for companies to spend more time, effort, and resources into a solid proactive talent identification and acquisition strategy. Anyone who comes to you from a job posting or social content is just the icing on the cake, IMO.

@Sourcing Samuri - well said!  It is equally critical for hiring managers and HR to always keep in mind what it&#039;s like to be on the other side of the process, but from my experience, VERY few do. I&#039;ve seen hiring managers that get so cocky with their corporate/employment brand that they will extend offers &lt;strong&gt;under&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt; a very good candidate&#039;s current pay.  My question to them is how would you feel, what kind of message does that send to you, and what would you do/how would you react?

@RecruiterB - exactly. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kristin &#8211; thank you for your comment! The simple fact that the majority of people are NOT looking is reason enough for companies to spend more time, effort, and resources into a solid proactive talent identification and acquisition strategy. Anyone who comes to you from a job posting or social content is just the icing on the cake, IMO.</p>
<p>@Sourcing Samuri &#8211; well said!  It is equally critical for hiring managers and HR to always keep in mind what it&#8217;s like to be on the other side of the process, but from my experience, VERY few do. I&#8217;ve seen hiring managers that get so cocky with their corporate/employment brand that they will extend offers <strong>under</strong><em> a very good candidate&#8217;s current pay.  My question to them is how would you feel, what kind of message does that send to you, and what would you do/how would you react?</p>
<p>@RecruiterB &#8211; exactly. <img src='http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coresourcing</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6289</link>
		<dc:creator>Coresourcing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6289</guid>
		<description>I guess its just a matter of perspective

Your Job board searches (Fishing in a pond&quot;)
Your SM techniques (Fishing in the sea with a net)
Web and telephone research (Deep sea diving)

Pick your skill and you will find the best approach. All these approaches have their space and purpose in sourcing.

Anything new is hyped so lets not worry too much about it. the focus should be in finding where it fits and I still think, the solution is yet to come

Hope it helps</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess its just a matter of perspective</p>
<p>Your Job board searches (Fishing in a pond&#8221;)<br />
Your SM techniques (Fishing in the sea with a net)<br />
Web and telephone research (Deep sea diving)</p>
<p>Pick your skill and you will find the best approach. All these approaches have their space and purpose in sourcing.</p>
<p>Anything new is hyped so lets not worry too much about it. the focus should be in finding where it fits and I still think, the solution is yet to come</p>
<p>Hope it helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarang</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6288</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6288</guid>
		<description>Glen,

Nice article. 

With Social Media booming - it is in danger of being overhyped. Recruiters / Sourcers has started using it at maximum extent; however if you are only using it to push the content - then it&#039;s just post and pray approach. In that case they just become &quot;Inbox Recruiters 2.0&quot;. 

With social media - it has given a visibility to those hidden leads which would have never come in highlight. You have to actively hunt them by selling right opportunity to right candidates. 

It&#039;s important that you reach out to leads than waiting for something to happen!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glen,</p>
<p>Nice article. </p>
<p>With Social Media booming &#8211; it is in danger of being overhyped. Recruiters / Sourcers has started using it at maximum extent; however if you are only using it to push the content &#8211; then it&#8217;s just post and pray approach. In that case they just become &#8220;Inbox Recruiters 2.0&#8243;. </p>
<p>With social media &#8211; it has given a visibility to those hidden leads which would have never come in highlight. You have to actively hunt them by selling right opportunity to right candidates. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s important that you reach out to leads than waiting for something to happen!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourcing Samuri</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6285</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourcing Samuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 16:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6285</guid>
		<description>&quot;&quot;&quot;It’s a shame that too few sourcers and recruiters take the time to think about what the world looks like through the eyes of a passive or non-job seeking “A” player.&quot;&quot;&quot;

-the above statement might be the most under-utilized and under-appreciated concept in the Recruiting game today.  Without question, Recruiters and Sourcers MUST practice this on a daily basis in order develop the relationships necessary to secure the employment of those top tier, passive candidates.  The larger challenge, in my opinion and personal experience, is managing the hiring team into understanding this concept.  Hiring Managers, HR Managers, Compensation Team, and the Recruiter need to be on the same page regarding the “minimal requirements” a passive candidate is looking for in order to make a move.  In almost all cases, the candidate is currently happy in their position and will need to be “lured” away.  Making lateral offers, or even 5-10% salary increases is not cutting it these days.  Top tier candidates are looking for 15-20% salary increases in order to leave their current comfortable situation.

Nice thought-provoking article, Glen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;"It’s a shame that too few sourcers and recruiters take the time to think about what the world looks like through the eyes of a passive or non-job seeking “A” player.&#8221;"&#8221;</p>
<p>-the above statement might be the most under-utilized and under-appreciated concept in the Recruiting game today.  Without question, Recruiters and Sourcers MUST practice this on a daily basis in order develop the relationships necessary to secure the employment of those top tier, passive candidates.  The larger challenge, in my opinion and personal experience, is managing the hiring team into understanding this concept.  Hiring Managers, HR Managers, Compensation Team, and the Recruiter need to be on the same page regarding the “minimal requirements” a passive candidate is looking for in order to make a move.  In almost all cases, the candidate is currently happy in their position and will need to be “lured” away.  Making lateral offers, or even 5-10% salary increases is not cutting it these days.  Top tier candidates are looking for 15-20% salary increases in order to leave their current comfortable situation.</p>
<p>Nice thought-provoking article, Glen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Kalscheur</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6282</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Kalscheur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6282</guid>
		<description>You make such a great point.  Talent attraction is important and every company should have a strategy around it, but if you are not actively out there finding the people that will lead your company into the future, you are missing the boat. It&#039;s key to have a strategy to keep in touch with the people you&#039;ve sourced that like your company and what it has to offer, but are not able to move &quot;at the time&quot; --- aka the pipeline. Keeping those people top of mind and engaged is where it&#039;s at.  They&#039;ve already, in some small way, agreed to be an evangelist. And they probably have a network foull of good people like them.

Your post reminds me of one I read recently on Seth Godin&#039;s blog -- the art of seduction. No matter how great your employment branding content is, it won&#039;t matter to people who aren&#039;t seeking it out or have a reason to be affected by it. http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/07/the-art-of-seduction.html 
Hence the need to proactively identify the talent, give them a reason to care, and then let them choose to digest your employment marketing messages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make such a great point.  Talent attraction is important and every company should have a strategy around it, but if you are not actively out there finding the people that will lead your company into the future, you are missing the boat. It&#8217;s key to have a strategy to keep in touch with the people you&#8217;ve sourced that like your company and what it has to offer, but are not able to move &#8220;at the time&#8221; &#8212; aka the pipeline. Keeping those people top of mind and engaged is where it&#8217;s at.  They&#8217;ve already, in some small way, agreed to be an evangelist. And they probably have a network foull of good people like them.</p>
<p>Your post reminds me of one I read recently on Seth Godin&#8217;s blog &#8212; the art of seduction. No matter how great your employment branding content is, it won&#8217;t matter to people who aren&#8217;t seeking it out or have a reason to be affected by it. <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/07/the-art-of-seduction.html" rel="nofollow">http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/07/the-art-of-seduction.html</a><br />
Hence the need to proactively identify the talent, give them a reason to care, and then let them choose to digest your employment marketing messages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RecruiterB</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2010/07/having-trouble-attracting-the-right-candidates/comment-page-1/#comment-6281</link>
		<dc:creator>RecruiterB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=5710#comment-6281</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why are little job we do will not go away.  Recruiting is a verb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why are little job we do will not go away.  Recruiting is a verb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

