<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive Look at LinkedIn&#8217;s 4 New Dynamic Filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/</link>
	<description>Leveraging social networks, resume databases, and the Internet for sourcing and recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:48:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dinan</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dinan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5618</guid>
		<description>I used LinkedIn Recruiter when I was at Salesforce. It is useful, and gave me leads on quite a few candidates. However, using their premium service, I am struck by: 1) How slow the web pages load 10 Seconds or more for me. And really lousy UI design and workflow  2) I can&#039;t invite more  people. I have over 2700 connections, and am tapped out on invites. 3) Low hit rate. Lots of people have profiles. Very few are actively looking. Hotjobs, Dice, etc have much better % of people who are actually open to changing job 

But a great blog posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used LinkedIn Recruiter when I was at Salesforce. It is useful, and gave me leads on quite a few candidates. However, using their premium service, I am struck by: 1) How slow the web pages load 10 Seconds or more for me. And really lousy UI design and workflow  2) I can&#8217;t invite more  people. I have over 2700 connections, and am tapped out on invites. 3) Low hit rate. Lots of people have profiles. Very few are actively looking. Hotjobs, Dice, etc have much better % of people who are actually open to changing job </p>
<p>But a great blog posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5521</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5521</guid>
		<description>I have been an avid fan of LI since the beginning (2004) and have had both a paid account and currently work as a free user.  I will refrain from commenting on the pros and cons of the new features because the other limits of LI have become a hurdle to continuing on the system.   What could block a power user of a system they love?  The ridiculous limit of 3,000 invitations!  For the act of bringing a couple of thousand members to their system, LI has rewarded me (and many others) by eliminating my ability to connect any further!  I wonder if Facebook operates with this same limited vision?  This limit seems to cut off the LI nose just to spite their face.

Although I wouldn&#039;t be happy about switching back to a paid account, an unlimited invitation environment would certainly be something I cannot do for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been an avid fan of LI since the beginning (2004) and have had both a paid account and currently work as a free user.  I will refrain from commenting on the pros and cons of the new features because the other limits of LI have become a hurdle to continuing on the system.   What could block a power user of a system they love?  The ridiculous limit of 3,000 invitations!  For the act of bringing a couple of thousand members to their system, LI has rewarded me (and many others) by eliminating my ability to connect any further!  I wonder if Facebook operates with this same limited vision?  This limit seems to cut off the LI nose just to spite their face.</p>
<p>Although I wouldn&#8217;t be happy about switching back to a paid account, an unlimited invitation environment would certainly be something I cannot do for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinkedIn Takes People Search to Eleven &#171; Psychohistory</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5277</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkedIn Takes People Search to Eleven &#171; Psychohistory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5277</guid>
		<description>[...] intelligence, and personalized relevance.  (If you&#8217;re curious, the Boolean Black Belt got a sneak peak at some upcoming [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] intelligence, and personalized relevance.  (If you&#8217;re curious, the Boolean Black Belt got a sneak peak at some upcoming [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5119</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5119</guid>
		<description>Mike - I agree with you. I find quite a few sourcers and recruiters are unnecessarily discriminating when it comes to the amount of time people have spent in positions - especially if they have been with the same employer for many years. I think that&#039;s one of the down sides of making data-based decisions, rather than simply picking up the phone and making a call to actually engage candidates to find out more about them rather than making assumptions based on their profile or resume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; I agree with you. I find quite a few sourcers and recruiters are unnecessarily discriminating when it comes to the amount of time people have spent in positions &#8211; especially if they have been with the same employer for many years. I think that&#8217;s one of the down sides of making data-based decisions, rather than simply picking up the phone and making a call to actually engage candidates to find out more about them rather than making assumptions based on their profile or resume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5111</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5111</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope that people do not discount people that have been in a position for less than a certain amount of time when they have been with the same company for many years... I see this is a potential issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope that people do not discount people that have been in a position for less than a certain amount of time when they have been with the same company for many years&#8230; I see this is a potential issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New features in LinkedIn Recruiter help you find the right talent &#171; Recruiting with LinkedIn Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>New features in LinkedIn Recruiter help you find the right talent &#171; Recruiting with LinkedIn Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>[...] can read Boolean Black Belt&#8217;s review of these new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read Boolean Black Belt&#8217;s review of these new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5081</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5081</guid>
		<description>Jer,
I had a demo of LIR, but I did not think to ask about the ability to link with people from the corporate account - thanks for clearing that up, as well as having to use an inmail to contact someone through LIR who you&#039;re connected to personally. I agree - that&#039;s LAME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jer,<br />
I had a demo of LIR, but I did not think to ask about the ability to link with people from the corporate account &#8211; thanks for clearing that up, as well as having to use an inmail to contact someone through LIR who you&#8217;re connected to personally. I agree &#8211; that&#8217;s LAME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Langhans</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Langhans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5061</guid>
		<description>huge CONS of using LIR:

1.)  you cannot link up with people
2.)  you have to burn an inmail to contact someone you are connected with
3.)  the phone #&#039;s are not pulled into the reports you are paying for

LAME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huge CONS of using LIR:</p>
<p>1.)  you cannot link up with people<br />
2.)  you have to burn an inmail to contact someone you are connected with<br />
3.)  the phone #&#8217;s are not pulled into the reports you are paying for</p>
<p>LAME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5045</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5045</guid>
		<description>I have had a paid account for the last 5 years. Yes, you can x-4ay and that is nice.

I did notice yesterday that there are advantages to having a paid account with a substantial searchable reach that you can expand significantly in the right direction with just a touch of &quot;seeding&quot;.

This &quot;sword&quot; is pretty sharp, but I&#039;ll sharpen some of the others through the Black Belts sage wisdom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a paid account for the last 5 years. Yes, you can x-4ay and that is nice.</p>
<p>I did notice yesterday that there are advantages to having a paid account with a substantial searchable reach that you can expand significantly in the right direction with just a touch of &#8220;seeding&#8221;.</p>
<p>This &#8220;sword&#8221; is pretty sharp, but I&#8217;ll sharpen some of the others through the Black Belts sage wisdom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Langhans</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/exclusive-look-at-linkedins-4-new-dynamic-filters/comment-page-1/#comment-5043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Langhans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4477#comment-5043</guid>
		<description>ps.  i LOVE these features about LIR:

* can see the entire db now / inmail them in bulk w/ templates (spam tastes gewd)

* project folders &amp; pdf/csv reporting (very yummy)

* the new UI is very web 2.0 (compared to the original li)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ps.  i LOVE these features about LIR:</p>
<p>* can see the entire db now / inmail them in bulk w/ templates (spam tastes gewd)</p>
<p>* project folders &amp; pdf/csv reporting (very yummy)</p>
<p>* the new UI is very web 2.0 (compared to the original li)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
