<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Candidate Pipelines vs. Just-In-Time Recruiting Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/</link>
	<description>Leveraging social networks, resume databases, and the Internet for sourcing and recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:48:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pt. 2 &#8211; The Flexible Workforce and Its Effect on Sourcing &#38; Recruiting &#171; Hutalentjam&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-6203</link>
		<dc:creator>Pt. 2 &#8211; The Flexible Workforce and Its Effect on Sourcing &#38; Recruiting &#171; Hutalentjam&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 02:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-6203</guid>
		<description>[...] *Cathey’s post: http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *Cathey’s post: <a href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just&#8230" rel="nofollow">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just&#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candidate Pipelines vs. Just-In-Time Recruiting Part 4</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5197</link>
		<dc:creator>Candidate Pipelines vs. Just-In-Time Recruiting Part 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5197</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 2 of this series, I introduced the concept of resumes and/or candidate profiles (ATS, social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 2 of this series, I introduced the concept of resumes and/or candidate profiles (ATS, social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candidate Pipelines vs. Just-In-Time Recruiting Part 3</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5106</link>
		<dc:creator>Candidate Pipelines vs. Just-In-Time Recruiting Part 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5106</guid>
		<description>[...] Part 1 and Part 2 in this series, I explored many of the intrinsic limitations and hidden costs of traditional [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part 1 and Part 2 in this series, I explored many of the intrinsic limitations and hidden costs of traditional [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: There is no Recruiting God &#171; Norton Folgate: The Recruiting Unblog</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5084</link>
		<dc:creator>There is no Recruiting God &#171; Norton Folgate: The Recruiting Unblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5084</guid>
		<description>[...] i have read 2 blogs from people whose views i respect @AndyHeadworth &amp; @BooleanBlackBlt. Glen&#8217;s (BooleanBlackBlt) blog covered the talent pool v just in time sourcing debate. Readers from the U.K. may not be familiar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] i have read 2 blogs from people whose views i respect @AndyHeadworth &amp; @BooleanBlackBlt. Glen&#8217;s (BooleanBlackBlt) blog covered the talent pool v just in time sourcing debate. Readers from the U.K. may not be familiar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5080</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5080</guid>
		<description>Justin, I am sure I will be writing more on the topic of Lean recruiting, leaking bits and pieces of what it would take to build a true RPS. If I ever get clearance to do so, I&#039;d like to write a book on the subject.

I am excited to hear Nestle has a recruiting process that was designed around Lean principles! As you can see if you do a little Internet research, there is VERY little written about the concepts of Lean recruiting, and even less about the actual practice. I see you noticed that I created a Lean sourcing and recruiting group (I just approved your request, thanks!) - I hope to get some discussions going there and attract more people who have experience with Lean recruiting as I do firmly believe it is only a matter of time before most companies realize the power and benefits of applying Lean principles to the recruiting process.

With regard to what you&#039;re doing at Nestle, I am curious to know - how much time and effort would you say is spent on performing proactive searches, and what % of proactively sourced candidates are spoken to?  Additionally, how much time and effort is spent on maintaining WIP candidate inventory for whom there is not a current hiring need? Exactly what level of effort is extended to maintain candidate pipelines - phone calls, personal emails, automated emails, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, I am sure I will be writing more on the topic of Lean recruiting, leaking bits and pieces of what it would take to build a true RPS. If I ever get clearance to do so, I&#8217;d like to write a book on the subject.</p>
<p>I am excited to hear Nestle has a recruiting process that was designed around Lean principles! As you can see if you do a little Internet research, there is VERY little written about the concepts of Lean recruiting, and even less about the actual practice. I see you noticed that I created a Lean sourcing and recruiting group (I just approved your request, thanks!) &#8211; I hope to get some discussions going there and attract more people who have experience with Lean recruiting as I do firmly believe it is only a matter of time before most companies realize the power and benefits of applying Lean principles to the recruiting process.</p>
<p>With regard to what you&#8217;re doing at Nestle, I am curious to know &#8211; how much time and effort would you say is spent on performing proactive searches, and what % of proactively sourced candidates are spoken to?  Additionally, how much time and effort is spent on maintaining WIP candidate inventory for whom there is not a current hiring need? Exactly what level of effort is extended to maintain candidate pipelines &#8211; phone calls, personal emails, automated emails, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5078</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5078</guid>
		<description>Wendy, I think many recruiters never take the time to think about the value they are providing (or not) to candidates they indefinitely &quot;keep warm.&quot; There&#039;s quite a bit of &quot;overprocessing&quot; going on with very little value passed on to the candidates.

Regarding your &quot;shelf life&quot; comment - I wholeheartedly agree. More on that concept coming soon.  Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wendy, I think many recruiters never take the time to think about the value they are providing (or not) to candidates they indefinitely &#8220;keep warm.&#8221; There&#8217;s quite a bit of &#8220;overprocessing&#8221; going on with very little value passed on to the candidates.</p>
<p>Regarding your &#8220;shelf life&#8221; comment &#8211; I wholeheartedly agree. More on that concept coming soon.  Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5077</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5077</guid>
		<description>Jeremy,
Thank you for never failing to be entertaining!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy,<br />
Thank you for never failing to be entertaining!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Kerkhoff</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5075</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Kerkhoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5075</guid>
		<description>Kudo&#039;s to you Glen for describing this paradigm shift in recruiting.  I am a firm believer in this Lean practice in recruiting and can give testiment to the fact that it works.  All too often, I have heard recruiters in this economy say that they are taking advantage of this slow time to increase their candidate pipeline and inventory to better position themselves when things turn around.  One really has to question if today&#039;s inventory is going to be fresh for tomorrow&#039;s needs.  The real secret is knowing that the shelf life for recruiting inventory is actually quite short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudo&#8217;s to you Glen for describing this paradigm shift in recruiting.  I am a firm believer in this Lean practice in recruiting and can give testiment to the fact that it works.  All too often, I have heard recruiters in this economy say that they are taking advantage of this slow time to increase their candidate pipeline and inventory to better position themselves when things turn around.  One really has to question if today&#8217;s inventory is going to be fresh for tomorrow&#8217;s needs.  The real secret is knowing that the shelf life for recruiting inventory is actually quite short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Langhans</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5065</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Langhans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5065</guid>
		<description>Muri (無理, “unreasonable”)
 is a Japanese term for overburden, unreasonableness or absurdity, which has become popularized in the wonderful world of Sourcing Talent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muri (無理, “unreasonable”)<br />
 is a Japanese term for overburden, unreasonableness or absurdity, which has become popularized in the wonderful world of Sourcing Talent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourcing Samuri</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/11/candidate-pipelines-vs-just-in-time-recruiting-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5063</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourcing Samuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=4430#comment-5063</guid>
		<description>BBB,

I would be interested in learning surface level info about your theories in what a full life cycle Lean RPS (Recruiting Production System) would look like. (Either off-blog, or in a future post...)

At Nestle we have develolped a very-sophisticated, end to end recruiting process that cleverly pays heavy attention to Maintained Pipelines, Proactive Search&#039;s, and well thought out Workforce Plans (hire forcasting).  The concept was designed around LEAN principals, and was created to mainly attack our &quot;time to fill&quot; metric.  I&#039;m confident it&#039;s effective, but am certain it could be improved.  I&#039;d be curious to hear your perspective on what we&#039;re doing...

Ciao</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBB,</p>
<p>I would be interested in learning surface level info about your theories in what a full life cycle Lean RPS (Recruiting Production System) would look like. (Either off-blog, or in a future post&#8230;)</p>
<p>At Nestle we have develolped a very-sophisticated, end to end recruiting process that cleverly pays heavy attention to Maintained Pipelines, Proactive Search&#8217;s, and well thought out Workforce Plans (hire forcasting).  The concept was designed around LEAN principals, and was created to mainly attack our &#8220;time to fill&#8221; metric.  I&#8217;m confident it&#8217;s effective, but am certain it could be improved.  I&#8217;d be curious to hear your perspective on what we&#8217;re doing&#8230;</p>
<p>Ciao</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
