<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Search: The Asterisk Wildcard and Punctuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/</link>
	<description>Leveraging LinkedIn, Twitter, Social Media, Resume Databases, and the Internet for Sourcing and Recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: corporate finance company</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7918</link>
		<dc:creator>corporate finance company</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-7918</guid>
		<description>&quot;It&#039;s amazing to see what
kids are able to do - and having fun all the time! We, adults, sometimes need
to get out of our busy schedules to actually do something we really enjoy -
because only then it rocks! Only then...&quot; 


 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s amazing to see what<br />
kids are able to do &#8211; and having fun all the time! We, adults, sometimes need<br />
to get out of our busy schedules to actually do something we really enjoy -<br />
because only then it rocks! Only then&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasha</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-7846</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-7846</guid>
		<description>BTW, and update: all those punctuation marks no longer work to &quot;glue&quot; words together like quotation marks do. So now my search always looks like this: [minivan &quot;35.. mph&quot;].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, and update: all those punctuation marks no longer work to &#8220;glue&#8221; words together like quotation marks do. So now my search always looks like this: [minivan "35.. mph"].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-6465</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-6465</guid>
		<description>http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=134479
This is a place they have that statement. Good 
post though! =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=134479" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=134479</a><br />
This is a place they have that statement. Good<br />
post though! =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danish Haidri</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Danish Haidri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>Great insight! How do we insert location into the boolean search string?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insight! How do we insert location into the boolean search string?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tasha Bergson-Michelson</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>Tasha Bergson-Michelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 04:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>Well, being another one of &quot;those girls&quot; (nice to meet you, Kelly!), I&#039;d like to share some thoughts on all the exciting and interesting comments above:

I had wondered about the =*= when I first saw it in Shally Steckerl&#039;s wonderful Google cheat sheet, too. Looking into it, there is a Google help document, with a copyright date of 2002 that states: 
&quot;Google recognizes hyphens, slashes, periods, equal signs, and apostrophes as phrase connectors.&quot;
(one copy of it is posted at: http://www.usdoj.gov/google_user_help.html, and also many other places, but apparently no longer on Google)

For some time, I have been using hyphens to substitute for quotation marks in certain situations, e.g.: [minivan 35..-mpg]. Here, I am able to use a number-range search and still &quot;glue&quot; another search term to it, to assure that the number range search result relates to the concept I desire. I can also do this search as [minivan 35..=mph] or [minivan &quot;35.. mph&quot;]. Though, I do see that it is bringing back some varying results--which I&#039;ll have to play with some more. (Sorry, I am a research trainer rather than a recruiter, so my searches may be a bit off-point for this audience.)

So, since you can use the punctuation listed above to &quot;glue&quot; terms together into a phrase, it solves the ~ problem that Glen and Kelly were discussing:

 “~administer * linux” negates the related term search usually stimulated by the tilde, but 

~administer=*=linux
 gives you the wildcard and also retains the related term search. One of you who knows more about recruiting will have to tell me if this is a good result, but it looks like it works to my eye.

What is brilliant about using =*= in training other searchers is that it makes spaces visible, and helps people remember to have them there, when other forms of notating spaces can be confusing.

Glen, thanks for the awesome post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, being another one of &#8220;those girls&#8221; (nice to meet you, Kelly!), I&#8217;d like to share some thoughts on all the exciting and interesting comments above:</p>
<p>I had wondered about the =*= when I first saw it in Shally Steckerl&#8217;s wonderful Google cheat sheet, too. Looking into it, there is a Google help document, with a copyright date of 2002 that states:<br />
&#8220;Google recognizes hyphens, slashes, periods, equal signs, and apostrophes as phrase connectors.&#8221;<br />
(one copy of it is posted at: <a href="http://www.usdoj.gov/google_user_help.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.usdoj.gov/google_user_help.html</a>, and also many other places, but apparently no longer on Google)</p>
<p>For some time, I have been using hyphens to substitute for quotation marks in certain situations, e.g.: [minivan 35..-mpg]. Here, I am able to use a number-range search and still &#8220;glue&#8221; another search term to it, to assure that the number range search result relates to the concept I desire. I can also do this search as [minivan 35..=mph] or [minivan "35.. mph"]. Though, I do see that it is bringing back some varying results&#8211;which I&#8217;ll have to play with some more. (Sorry, I am a research trainer rather than a recruiter, so my searches may be a bit off-point for this audience.)</p>
<p>So, since you can use the punctuation listed above to &#8220;glue&#8221; terms together into a phrase, it solves the ~ problem that Glen and Kelly were discussing:</p>
<p> “~administer * linux” negates the related term search usually stimulated by the tilde, but </p>
<p>~administer=*=linux<br />
 gives you the wildcard and also retains the related term search. One of you who knows more about recruiting will have to tell me if this is a good result, but it looks like it works to my eye.</p>
<p>What is brilliant about using =*= in training other searchers is that it makes spaces visible, and helps people remember to have them there, when other forms of notating spaces can be confusing.</p>
<p>Glen, thanks for the awesome post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4310</link>
		<dc:creator>David H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4310</guid>
		<description>Thanks for these interesting insights. I have a (possibly) dumb question, but it is causing me major problems right now. 

Essentially I need to search for pages that contain an asterisk (&quot;*&quot;) joined to a word (in particular the phrase &quot;miRNA*&quot;) where the asterisk DOES NOT represent a wild card, but literally the asterisk character. 

Does anyone know how to do this?

many many thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for these interesting insights. I have a (possibly) dumb question, but it is causing me major problems right now. </p>
<p>Essentially I need to search for pages that contain an asterisk (&#8220;*&#8221;) joined to a word (in particular the phrase &#8220;miRNA*&#8221;) where the asterisk DOES NOT represent a wild card, but literally the asterisk character. </p>
<p>Does anyone know how to do this?</p>
<p>many many thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed N.</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>I suspect that Google uses the Linux wildcards.  I&#039;m not &quot;that girl&quot; but I might play with if if I get bored.

http://www.codecoffee.com/tipsforlinux/articles/26-1.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that Google uses the Linux wildcards.  I&#8217;m not &#8220;that girl&#8221; but I might play with if if I get bored.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.codecoffee.com/tipsforlinux/articles/26-1.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.codecoffee.com/tipsforlinux/articles/26-1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4183</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4183</guid>
		<description>Ryan - I appreciate your readership; thanks for commenting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan &#8211; I appreciate your readership; thanks for commenting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4182</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4182</guid>
		<description>Joe - thanks for reading and for your kind comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8211; thanks for reading and for your kind comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/09/google-search-the-asterisk-wildcard-and-punctuation/comment-page-1/#comment-4180</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=3428#comment-4180</guid>
		<description>Gary,
That&#039;s the odd thing. Some of the punctuation that Google claims to ignore actually alters search results - which technically they shouldn&#039;t. That&#039;s why I find it so interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,<br />
That&#8217;s the odd thing. Some of the punctuation that Google claims to ignore actually alters search results &#8211; which technically they shouldn&#8217;t. That&#8217;s why I find it so interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

