<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn&#8217;s Advanced Search Operators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/</link>
	<description>Leveraging social networks, resume databases, and the Internet for sourcing and recruiting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:53:20 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LinkedIn Shows New Search Options, Some No Longer Free</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-6127</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkedIn Shows New Search Options, Some No Longer Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-6127</guid>
		<description>[...] for filtering results by &#8220;Interested In,&#8221; I&#8217;d like to remind you about LinkedIn&#8217;s Advanced Search operators. I wrote about them in January 2009, but I don&#8217;t know many people who make use of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for filtering results by &#8220;Interested In,&#8221; I&#8217;d like to remind you about LinkedIn&#8217;s Advanced Search operators. I wrote about them in January 2009, but I don&#8217;t know many people who make use of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-4186</link>
		<dc:creator>Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-4186</guid>
		<description>LinkedIn appears to have dropped support for their advanced operators - it seems to have happened around the same time that they incorporated their &quot;dynamic search refinements.&quot; I&#039;ve written them several times with no response. They need to take down their advanced search operator table in their Learning Center if they are going to abandon them. I&#039;m very disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LinkedIn appears to have dropped support for their advanced operators &#8211; it seems to have happened around the same time that they incorporated their &#8220;dynamic search refinements.&#8221; I&#8217;ve written them several times with no response. They need to take down their advanced search operator table in their Learning Center if they are going to abandon them. I&#8217;m very disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John X</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>John X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-4086</guid>
		<description>I’ve been working with the advanced operators in LinkedIn and I can’t get them to work.

For example: ctitle:manager doesn’t bring back any results.

LinkedIn doesn’t seem to be supporting these searches anymore – any info you have would be greatly appreciated – thanks – John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been working with the advanced operators in LinkedIn and I can’t get them to work.</p>
<p>For example: ctitle:manager doesn’t bring back any results.</p>
<p>LinkedIn doesn’t seem to be supporting these searches anymore – any info you have would be greatly appreciated – thanks – John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John X</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-4085</link>
		<dc:creator>John X</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 03:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-4085</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working with the advanced operators in LinkedIn and I can&#039;t get them to work.

For example: ctitle:manager doesn&#039;t bring back any results. 

LinkedIn doesn&#039;t seem to be supporting these searches anymore - any info you have would be greatly appreciated - thanks - John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been working with the advanced operators in LinkedIn and I can&#8217;t get them to work.</p>
<p>For example: ctitle:manager doesn&#8217;t bring back any results. </p>
<p>LinkedIn doesn&#8217;t seem to be supporting these searches anymore &#8211; any info you have would be greatly appreciated &#8211; thanks &#8211; John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recruiters Account for 1 in 20 U.S. LinkedIn Profiles &#124; Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Recruiters Account for 1 in 20 U.S. LinkedIn Profiles &#124; Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>[...] If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search operators (e.g., country:, ctitle: used above), you can learn all about them here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search operators (e.g., country:, ctitle: used above), you can learn all about them here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: georg</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-3799</link>
		<dc:creator>georg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-3799</guid>
		<description>great article.

Do you know if AND operators can be used ?

for example, search for all people who worked now or before at
both company A and company B, wherein the company adv search line would
have
companyA AND companyB

This does not seem to work to give expected results.

Am choosing the current and past subchoice for the company names.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article.</p>
<p>Do you know if AND operators can be used ?</p>
<p>for example, search for all people who worked now or before at<br />
both company A and company B, wherein the company adv search line would<br />
have<br />
companyA AND companyB</p>
<p>This does not seem to work to give expected results.</p>
<p>Am choosing the current and past subchoice for the company names.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FREE LinkedIn Search: Internal vs. X-Ray &#124; Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-2605</link>
		<dc:creator>FREE LinkedIn Search: Internal vs. X-Ray &#124; Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-2605</guid>
		<description>[...] There are actually a number of different ways and places to search for people on Linkedin. The more powerful methods involve #1 LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search interface and  #2 &#8220;Hand-coding&#8221; search strings using LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search operators. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are actually a number of different ways and places to search for people on Linkedin. The more powerful methods involve #1 LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search interface and  #2 &#8220;Hand-coding&#8221; search strings using LinkedIn&#8217;s advanced search operators. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinkedIn: Private vs. Out of Network Results &#124; Boolean Black Belt</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>LinkedIn: Private vs. Out of Network Results &#124; Boolean Black Belt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>[...] recently wrote about how to leverage LinkedIn&#8217;s Advanced Search Operators and I commented on LinkedIn&#8217;s relatively new search interface. Aside from search options, one [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently wrote about how to leverage LinkedIn&#8217;s Advanced Search Operators and I commented on LinkedIn&#8217;s relatively new search interface. Aside from search options, one [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Pankow</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Pankow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Mary,

If I click &quot;my network only&quot; and order by relationship, my search shows my 1st line connections first, then my 2nd line connections.  IT WILL NOT SHOW THIRD LINE CONNECTIONS.

If I choose to show all search results, it returns the above, then it mixes 3rd line connections and out of network connections (useless since they do not show names) and group members all thrown randomly together.

Mixing 3rd level connections with out of network connections is a major problem.

The new search interface is HORRIBLE.  I don&#039;t understand how anyone could find it better.  My account is limited to 100 search results when it used to be 500.  My associate&#039;s PAID account which used to generate 500 now generates 300 (they want him to pay more for the same results now).

Unless you are a large corporation that can afford their obscenely expensive &quot;corporate solutions&quot; account (which shows names for everyone), linked in has become almost useless.

For larger searches I usually Xray linkedin with Google operators (site: command and inurl: command).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mary,</p>
<p>If I click &#8220;my network only&#8221; and order by relationship, my search shows my 1st line connections first, then my 2nd line connections.  IT WILL NOT SHOW THIRD LINE CONNECTIONS.</p>
<p>If I choose to show all search results, it returns the above, then it mixes 3rd line connections and out of network connections (useless since they do not show names) and group members all thrown randomly together.</p>
<p>Mixing 3rd level connections with out of network connections is a major problem.</p>
<p>The new search interface is HORRIBLE.  I don&#8217;t understand how anyone could find it better.  My account is limited to 100 search results when it used to be 500.  My associate&#8217;s PAID account which used to generate 500 now generates 300 (they want him to pay more for the same results now).</p>
<p>Unless you are a large corporation that can afford their obscenely expensive &#8220;corporate solutions&#8221; account (which shows names for everyone), linked in has become almost useless.</p>
<p>For larger searches I usually Xray linkedin with Google operators (site: command and inurl: command).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Gunn</title>
		<link>http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/2009/01/linkedins-advanced-search-operators/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Gunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.booleanblackbelt.com/?p=1176#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>Greg, 

Unless there&#039;s something I&#039;m missing here....  you can check the box on 4th line up from the bottom left that says &quot;Limit search to my network only&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg, </p>
<p>Unless there&#8217;s something I&#8217;m missing here&#8230;.  you can check the box on 4th line up from the bottom left that says &#8220;Limit search to my network only&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
